Jump to content

User talk:Pbrks/Archives/2007

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image tagging for Image:Thrice.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Thrice.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:19, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application

Dear Pbroks13,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that at this time you do not meet the minimum requirement of 250 edits to mainspace articles (see under main here). Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. --frothT 18:30, 12 January 2007 (UTC)


Fair Use

Please do not add album images to stand-alone galleries with little information. Wikipedia does not allow users to add such images without getting proper consent from the album's copyright holder. See WP:FUC and WP:FU for further information. --  ShadowJester07  ►Talk  04:41, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Pbroks13. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that: you have little experience vandal fighting. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. Prodego talk 20:25, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

It is no trouble at all, thanks for bringing your concerns forward. The reason that we like applicants to have some experience in anti-vandal patrol is twofold. Firstly, it is inevitable that new vandal patrollers will make some mistakes as they learn, and while someone eventually points any mistakes out to them, with VP it is possible to affect a large number of users before this is noticed. Secondly, VP is geared to people who understand the terminology used in vandal patrol; it often abbreviates terms and such. Some manual RC patrol, or patrol with less intensive tools is enough to familiarize users with these things. You certainly meet any other requirements, I don't see any disruptive history, or anything like that, so if you just try out vandal patrolling with a 'starter' tool (I strongly recommend Lupin's tool, it's 'bad words' list and regexes are quite superior to any tool out there, including VP. However, it has some disadvantages, it is slow, and a bit harder to easily revert and warn with it. If you try it out, and I see you reverting only vandalism and warning the vandals with the appropriate warnings, I will be happy to approve you. Again, thanks for contacting me, Prodego talk 00:02, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Certainly, it was no trouble at all. Remember to warn vandals when you revert them. Happy editing! Prodego talk 21:42, 4 May 2007 (UTC)


Please do not revert citated sources as you did on the Anberlin page

Kapish? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hoponpop69 (talk • contribs) 02:59, 7 May 2007 (UTC).

Personal attack removed Hoponpop69 06:49, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

I regret to inform you that you are wrong

It doesn't matter if the band don't want to be considered a christian rock band, it is based on what reliable sources say. The reliable sources which YOU deleted. If you do it again you will violate the Wikipedia:Three-revert rule and be blocked. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by